From Wild Fundraising to Unwarranted Hype, What Is Happening to Crypto VCs?
Original Article Title: "Crypto VC in the Midst of Liquidity Anxiety: An Unfolding Imbalance"
Original Source: ChandlerZ, Foresight News
Waterdrop Capital partner Dashan admitted in a recent Space session that all four projects he had recently invested in had launched on Binance, but none had distributed tokens to investors according to the original investment agreement. Despite the token distribution terms being clearly outlined in the contract, after the project goes live, the agreement can be amended at will, and investors are almost unable to take any effective countermeasures.
He mentioned that the amendment to the agreement was not actually the project team's intention, but rather a longstanding unwritten rule of Binance, so he does not blame the project teams because they are also at a disadvantage in front of Binance. The current strategy is very clear: to persuade and help truly high-quality project teams to forgo token distribution and go directly to listing on a relatively clean and regulated market to showcase their value.
In traditional VC investments, rights protection based on contracts does not have the same practical binding force in the encrypted token investment structure. Due to exchanges leading circulation rules after token listing, on-chain asset allocation is not immediately bound by the traditional legal system, and investment agreements often lose their enforceability at critical junctures. In the current market environment, whether a project can gain access to a top exchange directly affects its overall survival, and the importance of agreement terms is marginalized in the face of actual interests. In order to get listed, project teams have to cooperate with exchanges in redesigning aspects such as release schedule, lock-up rules, token distribution ratios, etc. Investors, lacking on-chain governance rights and circulation discourse power, find themselves in a de facto rights disadvantage.
This statement reveals a deep-rooted crisis that the current crypto VC investment system is facing, namely a dilemma where the effectiveness of contracts, liquidity control, and exit mechanisms have completely failed.
Imbalance of Power: The New Relationship Among VCs, Projects, and Exchanges
In the industry's development over the past few years, the model of "project narrative construction - multi-round VC financing - top exchange token generation event (TGE)/listing" has gradually become mainstream. The hallmark of this model is that in the early stages, projects rely on professional VC institutions for funding, resource connection, and reputation endorsement, completing financing with gradually increasing valuations, with the ultimate goal usually being the initial token issuance and circulation on a large centralized exchange for early investors to exit.
In the previous multiple bull markets, crypto VCs, as core resources, held significant power in early-stage financing and token issuance design, playing a key role in driving rapid industry expansion and project incubation. In the last bull market, the position of project teams was enhanced, but VCs still had some dominance due to their large capital and liquidity empowerment such as Launchpad.
However, as the market enters a new adjustment period, liquidity in the altcoin space dries up, and the incentive structure between investors and projects shifts. Exchange power has reached unprecedented levels, becoming the absolute controller of liquidity, with key processes such as listing approval, token allocation, and circulation strategy concentrated in the hands of exchanges. This places projects in an extremely weak position during negotiations, even if they have signed detailed investment agreements. Faced with exchange-proposed changes to circulation conditions, project teams find it difficult to refuse, ultimately having to violate the original agreements with investors.
Exchanges have become the controllers of scarce resources, while VCs are gradually being marginalized, with their actual control capacity significantly reduced.
The "Prisoner's Dilemma" in Liquidity Contraction
The current dilemma faced by "VC coins" is not caused by a single factor.
After multiple rounds of funding, projects often have a high public market valuation at the time of Token Generation Event (TGE). This directly results in a high initial buy-in cost for secondary market investors, while also implying that early investors including VCs, the team, early supporters, etc., hold a large amount of low-cost chips and have a strong potential sell-off motive.
This expectation gap puts tokens under natural selling pressure after listing, with market participants potentially forming a consensus that "selling is the optimal strategy," triggering a negative feedback loop.
Furthermore, the token economy itself exacerbates the dilemma of VC coins.
During a bull market, many projects' token issuance models follow the high growth assumptions of the bull market, such as continuous market cap growth and sufficient liquidity to support gradual unlocking. However, in practice, many projects lack real revenue support, with DeFi relying on Ponzi schemes, GameFi relying on subsidies, NFTs relying on FOMO, and tokens completely losing intrinsic growth momentum.
Most importantly, tokens invested by VCs in the past could eventually be sold to new retail investors on the secondary market, forming a complete exit path. However, there are currently very few new retail investors on-chain and on exchanges, incremental funding is drying up, and VC mutual selling has become the norm.
Essentially, early investors, project teams, liquidity providers, and early users have become part of a zero-sum game within a closed loop, making it increasingly difficult to exit.

VC Return in the Previous Bull Market Cycle

VC Return in the Current Cycle
For VC firms, the traditional strategy of relying on rapid TGEs to achieve high multiple exits is facing challenges, and the realization period of investment returns may lengthen, increasing uncertainty. This may prompt VCs to focus more on a project's long-term fundamentals, sustainable business models, reasonable valuations, and healthier tokenomic models when making investment decisions. Their role may also need to evolve from focusing on early-stage investment and driving listings to more in-depth post-investment management, strategic empowerment, and ecosystem development.
For project teams, there is a need to reassess their token issuance strategy and community relationships. Following the questioning of the "pump and dump" model, exploring a lower valuation starting point, a more equitable distribution mechanism, designing tokenomics that better incentivize long-term holders, as well as increasing operational transparency and strengthening accountability may be more worth exploring.
From a more macro perspective of industry development, the current challenges can be seen as an adjustment in the market's path to maturity. It has exposed issues accumulated during past rapid growth and may drive the formation of a more balanced, sustainable financing, and development ecosystem. This requires all market participants, including VCs, project teams, exchanges, investors, and even regulatory bodies, to collectively adapt to change, seeking to establish a new equilibrium between innovation incentives and risk control, efficiency, and fairness.
Original Article Link
You may also like

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Get Paid to Onboard? Try WEEX’s New Homepage with Rewards for Registration, Deposit & Trade

WEEX Custom Layout: Build Your Perfect Trading Workspace in Seconds
Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.
Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.
White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.



